🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its decision.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the districts created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House figure argued the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.