🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.